George the Freemason had received promises of land in exchange for his service as a major to the Crown and Parliament. He was surely not alone in this regard. Now we can understand why the secessionists bargained so fiercely in Paris for the British to cede land all the way to the Mississippi.
Here's a map of an adequate proposal made by the French in 1782:
Note well the proposed western boundary of the USA, the most pernicious and most dangerous empire in human history. The secessionists rejected that boundary, which was more than fair, and a few years later they published their new Constitution for no better reason than to strengthen their grip on land to which they had no possible legitimate claim.
One might now argue that the British, too, had no legitimate claim on "Indian Territory". Ok, fine, but then the British had no right to offer the territory to the American gangsters. Given the powerful financial interests involved in the USA since the days of Haym Solomon, the American empire looks like a racket to plunder the land for wealth needed to restore Israel to state power. (All of this is "self-evident" in a way that TJ's "Creator" is not.) So the Treaty of Paris (1783) is fraudulent, at least in part, but remember that it tacitly affirms the propriety of sedition, insurrection, and secession. This affirmation applies equally well to the USA and the UK, the successor to the Kingdom of Great Britain.
(3) Æsop's Fables, trans. by Townsend. Probably mistranslated but still useful for knocking street stupidity out of a person. Our cultural background as slaves and our contemporary politics suggest two fables immediately:
Then circle back to the first one about the excuses made by a wolf.
(4) Mishle (Proverbs) has 31 chapters. This suggests a daily reading, but not without the hazards of becoming lost again in the dangerous literature of Israelite supremacy (Ex. 19:5-6), Judean supremacy (Gen. 49:8-12), and egocentricity elevated to a supreme principle of existence (Ex. 3:14).
(5) Read mathematical proofs such as those showing the infinity of primes and the impossibility of writing √2 as a/b, where both a & b are integers. Very important to theology, esp. any which bloviates about a god and its willpower being greater than anything and everthing else. Any god which exists is no less a prisoner of laws (regularities) of existence than humans and other mortal beings.
It's by the way that Bibles give an incorrect value for π at 1 Kings 7:23 and 2 Chron. 4:2. π≠3. You would think that Nazis obsessed with the numbers 22 and 7 would have gotten a better approximation when dabbling in the occult and channeling their omniscient god(s), for π≈22/7. But no.
(6) A Brief Introduction to Eight Liberal Arts: Logic, Linguistics, Dialectics, Rhetoric, Mathematics, Cosmology (which encompasses physics & astronomy), Ethics, and Harmony.
Still unwritten, but the conceptual subtitle suggests numerous readings. As you can see, I've condensed elements of Capella's model, generalized a bit (e.g. linguistics, not grammar), added categories, and deëmphasized two aspects of music in order to suggest a broader conception of harmony.
(7) The Dhammapada (trans. by Narada with English and Pāli source). 423 verses in 26 chapters. Includes an important verse about no one, not even the buddhas, being wholly praiseworthy and without blame. Jesus the Mountebank could have avoided his grotesque suicide by meditating adequately upon the Dhammapada's condemnation of egocentricity.
(8) Artcle VII of the Constitution of the USA. Notice that it pretends to state the law on "Ratification" and "Establishment" before both ratification and establishment. Correct lawyering teaches that the source of relevant law can't be in the C itself. The preamble is another blatant fraud, for fewer than 1/2 of "the People" participated in the ordaining mentioned there, and many resisted. The preamble also implies that absolutely everyone has authority to rule. Now we have "liberals" demanding that ignorant, childish teenagers be allowed to vote. Of course, the Federalist calls no attention to these problems. And why would it have? The objects were "empire" (No. 1, 1st para.) and profiteering, such as through land speculation and financial swindles.
The picture of a vast criminal enterprise—now an existential threat to the entire Earth and its many beings—comes into better focus by scrutinizing the DoI, too. This piece of agitprop insists that we ought not to cast aside an old, familiar form of government for light and transient causes. Then it lauches into a diatribe about the alleged abuses of a single bad king. Motives included bitterness about the British actually trying to protect the interests of the "merciless Savages" to the west of the Appalachians. Consider, for instance the Royal Proclamation of 1763.
George the Freemason had received promises of land in exchange for his service as a major to the Crown and Parliament. He was surely not alone in this regard. Now we can understand why the secessionists bargained so fiercely in Paris for the British to cede land all the way to the Mississippi.
Here's a map of an adequate proposal made by the French in 1782:
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_North_America,_1782_(Life_of_William,_Earl_of_Shelburne)_(edited).jpg#mw-jump-to-license
Note well the proposed western boundary of the USA, the most pernicious and most dangerous empire in human history. The secessionists rejected that boundary, which was more than fair, and a few years later they published their new Constitution for no better reason than to strengthen their grip on land to which they had no possible legitimate claim.
One might now argue that the British, too, had no legitimate claim on "Indian Territory". Ok, fine, but then the British had no right to offer the territory to the American gangsters. Given the powerful financial interests involved in the USA since the days of Haym Solomon, the American empire looks like a racket to plunder the land for wealth needed to restore Israel to state power. (All of this is "self-evident" in a way that TJ's "Creator" is not.) So the Treaty of Paris (1783) is fraudulent, at least in part, but remember that it tacitly affirms the propriety of sedition, insurrection, and secession. This affirmation applies equally well to the USA and the UK, the successor to the Kingdom of Great Britain.
What we need to read is often a function of our thoughts. So I have other recommendations:
(1) Here's a brief commentary, both
written and spoken, on an old testament still called new: https://www.jewsforjudaism.org/knowledge/videos/six-reasons-why-jews-don-t-believe-in-jesus
(2) The 11th tablet of the Epic of Gilgamesh. But before we dive into that fictional source of material which found its way into other fiction, lets read and contemplate footnotes d and i at https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=genesis+6&version=NABRE
(3) Æsop's Fables, trans. by Townsend. Probably mistranslated but still useful for knocking street stupidity out of a person. Our cultural background as slaves and our contemporary politics suggest two fables immediately:
Hercules and the Wagoner: https://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/aesop/aes013.htm
The Bitch and Her Whelps: https://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/aesop/aes262.htm
Then circle back to the first one about the excuses made by a wolf.
(4) Mishle (Proverbs) has 31 chapters. This suggests a daily reading, but not without the hazards of becoming lost again in the dangerous literature of Israelite supremacy (Ex. 19:5-6), Judean supremacy (Gen. 49:8-12), and egocentricity elevated to a supreme principle of existence (Ex. 3:14).
(5) Read mathematical proofs such as those showing the infinity of primes and the impossibility of writing √2 as a/b, where both a & b are integers. Very important to theology, esp. any which bloviates about a god and its willpower being greater than anything and everthing else. Any god which exists is no less a prisoner of laws (regularities) of existence than humans and other mortal beings.
It's by the way that Bibles give an incorrect value for π at 1 Kings 7:23 and 2 Chron. 4:2. π≠3. You would think that Nazis obsessed with the numbers 22 and 7 would have gotten a better approximation when dabbling in the occult and channeling their omniscient god(s), for π≈22/7. But no.
(6) A Brief Introduction to Eight Liberal Arts: Logic, Linguistics, Dialectics, Rhetoric, Mathematics, Cosmology (which encompasses physics & astronomy), Ethics, and Harmony.
Still unwritten, but the conceptual subtitle suggests numerous readings. As you can see, I've condensed elements of Capella's model, generalized a bit (e.g. linguistics, not grammar), added categories, and deëmphasized two aspects of music in order to suggest a broader conception of harmony.
(7) The Dhammapada (trans. by Narada with English and Pāli source). 423 verses in 26 chapters. Includes an important verse about no one, not even the buddhas, being wholly praiseworthy and without blame. Jesus the Mountebank could have avoided his grotesque suicide by meditating adequately upon the Dhammapada's condemnation of egocentricity.
(8) Artcle VII of the Constitution of the USA. Notice that it pretends to state the law on "Ratification" and "Establishment" before both ratification and establishment. Correct lawyering teaches that the source of relevant law can't be in the C itself. The preamble is another blatant fraud, for fewer than 1/2 of "the People" participated in the ordaining mentioned there, and many resisted. The preamble also implies that absolutely everyone has authority to rule. Now we have "liberals" demanding that ignorant, childish teenagers be allowed to vote. Of course, the Federalist calls no attention to these problems. And why would it have? The objects were "empire" (No. 1, 1st para.) and profiteering, such as through land speculation and financial swindles.
The picture of a vast criminal enterprise—now an existential threat to the entire Earth and its many beings—comes into better focus by scrutinizing the DoI, too. This piece of agitprop insists that we ought not to cast aside an old, familiar form of government for light and transient causes. Then it lauches into a diatribe about the alleged abuses of a single bad king. Motives included bitterness about the British actually trying to protect the interests of the "merciless Savages" to the west of the Appalachians. Consider, for instance the Royal Proclamation of 1763.